McKeever

McKeever v. Security Consultants Group CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 2013F064294California1,565 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/26/13 McKeever v. Security Consultants Group CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

RUBBIE McKEEVER,

F064294

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 11CECG01326) v.

SECURITY CONSULTANTS GROUP, INC. et OPINION al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Jeffrey Y. Hamilton, Jr., Judge. Moore and Moore, Howard Moore, Jr.; Moore & Moore, Kojo Howard Moore, for Plaintiff and Appellant. Bremer, Whyte, Brown & O’Meara, John V. O’Meara, Patrick Au, and Sanaz Aryanpanah; Everett L. Skillman, Jr., for Defendants and Respondents. -ooOoo- Appellant, Rubbie McKeever, originally filed a complaint for personal injuries in federal court. Following dismissal of the federal action, McKeever filed an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.