Gracey

Gracey v. Tiles, Webb, Kulla & Grant CA2.7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 2013B234634California6,690 words

Opinion

Opinion

Woods, J.

Filed 2/25/13 Gracey v. Tiles, Webb, Kulla & Grant CA2.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

WAYNE W. GRACEY, et al., B234634

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC419069) v.

TILLES, WEBB, KULLA & GRANT,

et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Rolf M. Treu, Judge. Affirmed.

Mesisca, Riley & Kreitenberg, Dennis P. Riley, Rena E. Kreitenberg and Steven C. De Vore for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Robie & Matthai, Edith R. Matthai and Natalie A. Kouyoumdjian for Defendants and Respondents.

__________________________________ Appellants are successors-in-interest to owners of commercial property in Beverly Hills who sought…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.