Pantoja

Pantoja v. Countrywide Home Loans CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 2013H036232California7,730 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/28/13 Pantoja v. Countrywide Home Loans CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

CORNELIO PANTOJA, H036232

(Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. CV138528)

v.

COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC.,

et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

Appellant Cornelio Pantoja appeals from an order by the Santa Clara County Superior Court sustaining respondents Countrywide Home Loans Inc., Bank of America Corporation, Old Republic National Title Company, and Old Republic Default Management Services’ (collectively “Countrywide”) demurrer to his third amended complaint without leave to amend. Pantoja’s 18-page complaint alleged only one cause of action, that Countrywide committed unfair business practices and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.