San Luis Unit Food Producers v. United States

Good Law
709 F.3d 798·2013 WL 765206·2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 4256
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 1, 201311-16122California4,585 words

Opinion

Opinion

Trott, J.

Today we consider whether farmers and farming entities (collectively, “Farmers”) that irrigate their land using water from the San Luis Unit of the Central Valley Project — -the nation’s largest reclamation project — may maintain a claim under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) to compel the United States Bureau of Reclamation (“the Bureau”) to provide the Farmers’ irrigation districts with more water than it is currently providing. The Farmers argue that several federal statutes require the Bureau to provide irrigators with sufficient irrigation water to satisfy the Farmers’ needs before delivering water to any other party for any other purpose. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Bureau on several grounds, including that the Bureau does not have a statutory duty to release a certain amount of water for irrigation and that, consequently, the Farmers’ claims did not satisfy the final agency action requirement of the APA. Although the district court discussed this issue in terms of sovereign immunity, we resolve the case slightly differently.

Pursuant to the Supreme Court’s unanimous decision in Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.