Musgrove

Filed 9/13/22 (unmodified opn. attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

RONALD MUSGROVE et al., B311504

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC673010) v.

ORDER MODIFYING

JOEL SILVER, OPINION AND DENYING

REHEARING

Defendant and Respondent. NO CHANGE IN THE

JUDGMENT

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on August 25, 2022, be modified as follows:

1. At the end of the first (partial) sentence on page 8, which ends with “from our consideration,” insert footnote 3 as follows: In a petition for rehearing, plaintiffs contend that we impermissibly failed to address their evidentiary objections. We did no such thing. We assumed them to have merit, and proceeded to analyze the summary judgment on that assumption. As a result, analyzing the merits of the objections serves no purpose. Plaintiffs assert that we “necessarily relied” on the evidence we assumed to be invalidly admitted, contrary to our assumption. They are wrong.

2. After the next sentence on page…