In re D.O. CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I. INTRODUCTION
D.O. was detained and removed from his parents, F.M. (Mother) and G.L.
(Father), shortly after birth. The juvenile court terminated Mother’s and Father’s parental
rights after a contested hearing pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code 1 section
366.26. Father appeals from this order, arguing that the matter must be conditionally
reversed and remanded because the juvenile court, as well as San Bernardino County
Children and Family Services (CFS), failed to discharge their duty of inquiry under the
Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA; 25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.). We agree and
conditionally reverse.
II. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
D.O. was detained by CFS after testing positive for methamphetamines at the time
of his birth. Father did not appear at the detention hearing, but he was interviewed by a
social worker shortly thereafter. According to the social worker, Father reported that he
had a prior relationship with Mother, was aware Mother had mental health and substance
abuse issues, and also occasionally used elicit drugs. As a result, CFS filed an amended
petition pursuant to section 300 et seq., alleging Father’s failure to supervise or…