Sculls

Sculls v. Boardners CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 2022B309933California4,497 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/13/22 Sculls v. Boardners CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

JONNY SCULLS, et al., B309933

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC665786) v.

BOARDNERS, INC.,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Kristin S. Escalante, Judge. Affirmed.

Law Offices of Edward Y. Lee, Edward Y. Lee and Angela S. Lee, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Freeman Mathis & Gary, Stephen M. Caine and Robert A. Latham, for Defendant and Respondent.

__________________________ Plaintiffs Jonny and Lacey Sculls appeal after the trial court granted summary judgment on their premises liability claim against defendant Boardners, Inc. The Sculls argue the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.