Hunt

Hunt v. Golden Sate Boring & Pipe Jacking CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 14, 2022E076407California4,094 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/14/22 Hunt v. Golden Sate Boring & Pipe Jacking CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

BILLY HUNT, JR., et al.,

Plaintiffs and Respondents, E076407

v. (Super.Ct.No. CIVDS1930939)

GOLDEN STATE BORING & PIPE OPINION

JACKING, INC.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. David Cohn, Judge.

Affirmed.

Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo, Scott K. Dauscher, Jon M. Setoguchi

and David Kang for Defendant and Appellant.

James Hawkins, APLC, James R. Hawkins, Samantha A. Smith and Lance E.

Dacre for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

1 Plaintiffs Billy Hunt, Jr., and Thomas Ray, individually…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.