People v. Walker CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I.
INTRODUCTION
Defendant and appellant Vernon Robert Walker appeals the trial court’s
postjudgment order denying his request to conduct a supplemental sentencing hearing to
develop a record of mitigating circumstances for an eventual youthful offender parole 1 hearing pursuant to Penal Code 1203.01 and In re Cook (2019) 7 Cal.5th 439 (Cook).
The trial court found defendant was ineligible for a youthful offender parole hearing
because he had been sentenced to a term of life without the possibility of parole (LWOP)
and was statutorily ineligible. On appeal, defendant contends the trial court erred in
denying his request for a supplemental hearing because the court misunderstood its scope
of discretion when it found him ineligible. For reasons explained, we affirm the trial 2 court’s denial of a Franklin hearing. However, defendant’s counsel may file with the
clerk of the court a statement of their views concerning mitigating circumstances relating
to defendant and the crimes for which he was convicted for an eventual offender parole
hearing pursuant to section 1203.01.
1 All future statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise stated. 2 People v. Franklin…