People v. Walker CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 14, 2022E077803California2,644 words

Opinion

Opinion

I.

INTRODUCTION

Defendant and appellant Vernon Robert Walker appeals the trial court’s

postjudgment order denying his request to conduct a supplemental sentencing hearing to

develop a record of mitigating circumstances for an eventual youthful offender parole 1 hearing pursuant to Penal Code 1203.01 and In re Cook (2019) 7 Cal.5th 439 (Cook).

The trial court found defendant was ineligible for a youthful offender parole hearing

because he had been sentenced to a term of life without the possibility of parole (LWOP)

and was statutorily ineligible. On appeal, defendant contends the trial court erred in

denying his request for a supplemental hearing because the court misunderstood its scope

of discretion when it found him ineligible. For reasons explained, we affirm the trial 2 court’s denial of a Franklin hearing. However, defendant’s counsel may file with the

clerk of the court a statement of their views concerning mitigating circumstances relating

to defendant and the crimes for which he was convicted for an eventual offender parole

hearing pursuant to section 1203.01.

1 All future statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise stated. 2 People v. Franklin…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.