People v. Ramirez CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I.
INTRODUCTION
Defendant and appellant Omar Ramirez (Omar) appeals the trial court’s summary 1 denial of his petition for resentencing pursuant to Penal Code section 1170.95. He
argues the trial court erred in denying his petition without issuing an order to show cause
and holding an evidentiary hearing because he averred to facts rendered him eligible for
resentencing and the record does not indisputably show he is ineligible. The record of
conviction shows Omar is ineligible for resentencing as a matter of law. We therefore
affirm the court’s order.
II.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
During an encounter at a bar in 2006, Omar and his brother, codefendant Jonathan
Julian Ramirez (Jonathan) attacked and killed Enrique Bermudez (Bermudez), a 72-year-
old man who had asked them to be more respectful to their stepfather who was with them
at the bar. Defendants fled to Mexico the next day. After some years, they were
extradited and returned to the United States to stand trial in 2010.
1 That section has since been renumbered as Penal Code section 1172.6. (Stats. 2022, ch. 58, § 10.) However, because that change was nonsubstantive and it occurred after briefing in…