Herriott

Herriott v. Herriott CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 2022B311922California2,176 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/15/22 Herriott v. Herriott CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

PAULA HERRIOTT, B311922

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 20TRRO00819) v.

PARKER RICHARD HERRIOTT,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Glenda Veasey, Commissioner. Affirmed. Paula Herriott, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. No appearance for Defendant and Respondent.

‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗ Paula Herriott (Paula) appeals from an order denying her request for a civil harassment restraining order against her uncle, respondent Parker Richard Herriott (Parker).1 We find no error, and thus we will affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.