Steichen

Steichen v. Huffman CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 2022D079381California2,944 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/19/22 Steichen v. Huffman CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CHRISTINE STEICHEN, D079381

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2018- 00030963-CU-OR-CTL)

STANLEY HUFFMAN,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Eddie C. Sturgeon, Judge. Reversed and remanded with directions. Law Office of Johanna S. Schiavoni, Johanna S. Schiavoni; Trails Law Group, and Hillery M. Stones for Plaintiff and Appellant. White & Amundson and Daniel M. White for Defendant and Respondent.

Christine Steichen appeals from an order granting a motion to set aside a default judgment against Stanley Huffman. She asserts the trial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.