People v. Sterritt CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 2022C094005California3,845 words

Opinion

Opinion

Earl, J.

Filed 9/19/22 P. v. Sterritt CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C094005

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 19FE015607)

v.

KARA DENISHA STERRITT et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

In this consolidated appeal, defendants Kara Denisha Sterritt and Diimario Shanntrell Williams contend their convictions for the robbery of L.H. were not supported by sufficient evidence of intent.1 We disagree. However, Sterritt also contends that in sentencing, the trial court erred in imposing the upper term due to the amendments to Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (b), made by Senate Bill No. 567 (2021-2022 Reg. Sess.), and the matter should be remanded to the trial court for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.