Tye

Tye v. Escrow CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 2022E077065California8,489 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/19/22 Tye v. Escrow CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

MATTHEW TYE,

Plaintiff and Appellant, E077065

v. (Super.Ct.No. RIC1601882)

EMERALD ESCROW, OPINION

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Carol A. Greene, Judge.

Affirmed.

Matthew Tye, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, Ian A. Stewart, Sonya Tamiry and

William S. Cook for Defendant and Respondent.

Plaintiff and appellant Matthew Tye appeals the grant of the demurrer filed by

defendant and respondent Emerald Escrow Inc. (Emerald), which resulted in the

dismissal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.