Keading

Keading v. Keading CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 2022A159795California4,611 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/21/22 Keading v. Keading CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

KENTON KEADING,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

A159795

v. HILJA M. KEADING, et al., (Contra Costa County Super. Ct. No. MSP16-00402) Defendant and Respondent.

Kenton Keading1 was ordered disinherited as a beneficiary under the Survivor’s Trust of the Keading Family Trust after he violated a no contest clause by bringing two trust contests that were untimely and therefore without probable cause. On appeal, Kenton argues the applicable 120-day statute of limitations was not triggered due to defects in the required statutory notification that was served in March 2016. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A detailed discussion of the factual and procedural history of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.