In re J.M. CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 2022H048921California4,404 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wilson, J.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Procedural history On September 21, 2020, the Santa Clara County District Attorney filed a juvenile wardship petition (Petition T) alleging J.M. committed one count of carjacking (Pen. Code, § 215, subd. (a); count 1) and four counts of robbery (Pen. Code, § 212.5, subd. (c); counts 2-5). The petition made the following special allegations: (1) J.M. committed each of the offenses for the benefit of, at the direction of, and in association with a criminal street gang (Pen. Code, § 186.22, subd. (b)(1)(C)); (2) J.M. personally used a firearm in committing each of the offenses (Pen. Code, § 12022.53, subd. (b)); and (3) in connection with counts 1 and 2, J.M. personally discharged a firearm, causing great bodily injury (Pen. Code, § 12022.53, subds. (d), (e)(1)). Petition T also expressly notified J.M. that the district attorney intended “to move for an increase of the maximum term of confinement by aggregating the terms of all previously sustained petitions.”

2 On January 22, 2021, the juvenile court granted the prosecution’s motion to amend the petition to dismiss three of the robbery charges (counts 2, 4 & 5), and to amend count 3 to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.