People v. Reese CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 2022A157480California9,681 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/21/22 P. v. Reese CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A157480

v. DYLAN DAVID REESE, (Contra Costa County Super. Ct. No. 51713510) Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Dylan David Reese appeals a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of the second degree murder of Kimberly Hoglund. He contends the trial court improperly admitted evidence of prior acts of violence against two other women, that the prosecutor elicited inadmissible evidence, that the court erred in denying his request for a pinpoint instruction on the law of voluntary manslaughter, and that it improperly awarded victim restitution and imposed fines and fees without regard for his ability to pay. We shall…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.