Scott

Filed 9/21/22 Scott v. Sado CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

ZELIA SCOTT, B313037

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 19STCV31941) v.

PAUL SADO,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Patricia Nieto, Judge. Affirmed. L.A. Superlawyers and William W. Bloch for Plaintiff and Appellant. Enenstein Pham & Glass and Teri T. Pham for Defendant and Respondent.

________________________ Aspiring actress Zelia Scott contends that she was sexually assaulted by producer Paul Sado, an assertion Sado denies. Before any litigation was filed, Scott self-published an account of the assault on a public website. Thereafter, Scott sued Sado…