In re Y.O. CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 2022B318447California450 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/22/22 In re Y.O. CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

In re Y.O., a Person Coming 2d Juv. No. B318447 Under the Juvenile Court (Super. Ct. No. 21JV-00004) Law. (San Luis Obispo County)

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

Y.O.,

Defendant and Appellant.

Y.O. appeals from the judgment of the San Luis Obispo County Juvenile Court requiring him to submit to warrantless searches of his electronic devices as a condition of his probation. We appointed counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. After an examination of the record, counsel filed an opening brief that raises no arguable issues. On July 6, 2022, we notified appellant by mail that he had 30…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.