People v. Brim CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 2022B315433California975 words

Opinion

Opinion

Egerton, J.

Filed 9/22/22 P. v. Brim CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE, B315433

Plaintiff and Respondent, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. TA154169 v.

EDDIE BRIM,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Sean D. Coen, Judge. Affirmed.

Richard L. Fitzer, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. _________________________ In 2021, the People charged Eddie Brim with injuring a girlfriend, criminal threats, assault with a deadly weapon (a knife), kidnapping, and false imprisonment by violence. The alleged victim in all five counts was Jennifer V. The People alleged Brim had three…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.