Optional Capital v. DAS Corp. CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 2022B307445California338 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chaney, J.

Filed 9/26/22 Optional Capital v. DAS Corp. CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

OPTIONAL CAPITAL, INC., B307445, B307906

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC474472) v.

DAS CORPORATION,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Michelle Williams Court, Judge. Reversed. LTL Attorneys, James M. Lee, Joedat H. Tuffaha, Prashanth Chennakesavan for Defendant and Appellant. Rogari Law Firm, Ralph Rogari; Law Offices of Mary Lee, Mary Lee for Plaintiff and Appellant. ___________________________________ This case involved the efforts of two claimants, DAS, a Korean corporation, and Optional Capital, Inc., to retrieve money stolen by a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.