People v. Taylor CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 2022C091382California3,451 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/27/22 P. v. Taylor CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Shasta) ----

THE PEOPLE, C091382

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 08F5142)

v.

CURTIS WAYNE TAYLOR et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

Defendants Curtis Wayne Taylor and Beau Houston Gray appeal from the trial court’s order denying their petitions for resentencing under Penal Code1 former section 1170.95.2 Defendants contend: (1) the trial court impermissibly looked beyond

Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code. 2 Effective June 30, 2022, the Legislature renumbered former section 1170.95 to section 1172.6. (Stats. 2022, ch. 58, § 10.) There were no substantive changes to the statute. For purposes of clarity…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.