People v. Solis CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 2022B318394California197 words

Opinion

Opinion

Perren, J.

facts are derived from the transcript of the preliminary hearing. On the afternoon of October 20, 2018, appellant entered a liquor store wearing a ski mask, pointed a gun at the clerk, and demanded money from him. Appellant’s accomplice pointed a gun at another liquor store employee. The incident was captured on surveillance video. Eight days later appellant approached a marijuana dispensary delivery driver, showed him a gun, and took marijuana and other items from the trunk of the delivery driver’s car. During two subsequent traffic stops, appellant gave a false name and signed the citations with it. We appointed counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. After reviewing the record, counsel filed a brief raising no issues. On June 23, 2022, we advised appellant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues he wished us to consider. We received no response. We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that appellant's counsel has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 443; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 126.)

2 The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.