The Palm Grove v. Pirozzi CA2/6

Filed 9/27/22 The Palm Grove v. Pirozzi CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PALM GROVE, LLC, et al., 2d Civil No. B313186 (Super. Ct. No. 20CV02870) Plaintiffs and Respondents, (Santa Barbara County)

v.

ADAM PIROZZI et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

This case is the second round of litigation between former business partners Adam Pirozzi and Dennis Hoey.1 The first round resulted in a settlement in which Pirozzi agreed to buy Hoey’s interest in certain business assets, including a ten-acre golf course and onsite clubhouse. A second round of litigation

Appellants are Pirozzi and two of his co-defendants:

Quicklink Asset Services, LLC and Five Deep Entertainment, Inc. A third co-defendant, Central Holding…