Espinoza

Espinoza v. Super. Ct.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 2022B314914California7,974 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bendix, J.

Filed 9/27/

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

ROSA M. QUINCOZA ESPINOZA, B314914

Petitioner, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 20STCV34704) v.

OPINION AND ORDER

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS GRANTING

ANGELES COUNTY, PETITION FOR

WRIT OF MANDATE

Respondent;

CENTINELA SKILLED NURSING

& WELLNESS CENTRE WEST,

LLC,

Real Party in Interest.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING; petition for writ of mandate. Richard L. Fruin, Judge. Petition is granted. Pairavi Law, Edwin Pairavi and Joshua M. Mohrsaz for Petitioner. No appearance by Respondent. Fisher & Phillips, Grace Y. Horoupian, Hassan A. Aburish and Megan E. Walker for Real Party in Interest. Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Nicklas A. Akers, Assistant Attorney General, Michele Van Gelderen and Rachel A. Foodman, Deputy Attorneys General, for Attorney General as Amicus Curiae. ____________________________ Plaintiff and petitioner Rosa M. Quincoza Espinoza filed claims for discrimination and retaliation against her former employer, defendant and real party in interest Centinela Skilled…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.