Westport Village etc. v. Khanna CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 2022A164667California3,904 words

Opinion

Opinion

Miller, J.

Filed 9/28/22 Westport Village etc. v. Khanna CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

WESTPORT VILLAGE AT

IRONGATE COMMUNITY

ASSOCIATION, A164667

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Alameda County v. Super. Ct. No. RG16841558) AMIT KHANNA et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Westport Village at Irongate Community Association (Westport) sued Amit Khanna and Mayuri Bounprakob (defendants), who owned a home in the Westport development. Westport alleged that defendants kept an “aggressive dog” in violation of the covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&R’s) of the development. Defendants filed a cross-complaint alleging breach of contract and other claims. After years of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.