Schall

Schall v. Marina Admiralty Co. CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 2022B312918California3,891 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chavez, J.

Filed 9/28/22 Schall v. Marina Admiralty Co. CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

JANE SCHALL, B312918

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 19STCV37031) v.

MARINA ADMIRALTY

COMPANY et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Michael E. Whitaker, Judge. Affirmed.

Law Offices of Brian D. Witzer, Brian D. Witzer and Eric R. Canton for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Alderman & Hilgers and Allison R. Hilgers for Defendants and Respondents. Jane Schall (appellant) appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Marina Admiralty Company and E&S Ring Management Corp. (E&S) (collectively…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.