World Botanical Gardens v. Wagner CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 2022H049234California8,218 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/30/22 World Botanical Gardens v. Wagner CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

WORLD BOTANICAL GARDENS, INC., H049234

(Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. 20101CV183957)

v.

WALTER WAGNER et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

This appeal involves two judgments, one in Hawaii and a subsequent one entered in California. On September 28, 2009, World Botanical Gardens, Inc. (World Botanical or Company) obtained a multi-million dollar judgment in Hawaii against Walter Wagner (Wagner) and Dan Perkins (hereafter, the Hawaii judgment). (The judgment was also entered against Wagner’s spouse, Linda Walker.) One year later, on September 30, 2010, World Botanical applied in California for, and obtained entry of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.