In re I.Q. CA4/2
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 2022E078374California6,285 words
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 9/30/22 In re I.Q. CA4/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
In re I.Q., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.
THE PEOPLE,
E078374
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super.Ct.No. J281478) v.
OPINION
I.Q.,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Charles J. Umeda,
Judge. Affirmed.
Cynthia M. Jones, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and
Appellant.
Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Chief Assistant Attorney
General, Charles C. Ragland, Assistant Attorney General, Laura Bagget and Robin
Urbanski, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
1 Pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code1 section 801, subdivision (a), defendant
and appellant I.Q. (minor) appeals from an order transferring the…