In re I.Q. CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 2022E078374California6,285 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/30/22 In re I.Q. CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

In re I.Q., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

THE PEOPLE,

E078374

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super.Ct.No. J281478) v.

OPINION

I.Q.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Charles J. Umeda,

Judge. Affirmed.

Cynthia M. Jones, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and

Appellant.

Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Chief Assistant Attorney

General, Charles C. Ragland, Assistant Attorney General, Laura Bagget and Robin

Urbanski, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

1 Pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code1 section 801, subdivision (a), defendant

and appellant I.Q. (minor) appeals from an order transferring the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.