Jessica M. v. Emmanuel G. CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 4, 2022F083315California2,341 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/4/22 Jessica M. v. Emmanuel G. CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

JESSICA M.,

F083315

Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 20FL-01343) v.

EMMANUEL G., OPINION Appellant.

THE COURT *

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Merced County. Shelly Seymour, Judge. Emmanuel G., in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant. No response for Plaintiff and Respondent. -ooOoo-

* Before Levy, Acting P. J., Snauffer, J. and DeSantos, J. Appellant Emmanuel G. challenges the decision of the trial court to award sole custody of his son to the child’s mother, Jessica M. (mother), and to deny him visitation. We have reviewed the entire record and each argument raised by appellant. We conclud e the order entered by the trial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.