Diaz

Diaz v. Gordon CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 6, 2022B318157California1,903 words

Opinion

Opinion

Baltodano, J.

Filed 10/6/22 Diaz v. Gordon CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

JHONNATAN I. LEMUS DIAZ, 2d Civil No. B318157 (Super. Ct. No. 21CV02534) Plaintiff and Appellant, (Santa Barbara County)

v.

STEVE GORDON, as Director, etc.

Defendant and Respondent.

A California Highway Patrol (CHP) officer arrested Jhonnatan I. Lemus Diaz for driving under the influence of alcohol. After an administrative hearing, the Department of Motor Vehicles (department) suspended Diaz’s driver’s license. Diaz appeals from the denial of a petition for writ of administrative mandamus upholding the department’s ruling.1 He contends the hearing officer abused his discretion and denied

1 Steve Gordon is respondent as the Director of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.