In re K.R. CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 6, 2022B313854California2,159 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chaney, J.

BACKGROUND

I. Disposition of First Amended Section 300 Petition

Involving K.R. On February 22, 2021, after Mother waived her rights and pleaded no contest to an interlineated first amended dependency petition, the juvenile court assumed jurisdiction over Mother’s six-year-old son K.R., based on the following sustained 3 allegations against Mother: “The child, K[.]R[.]’s mother I[.]R[.] and the mother’s male companion D[.]B[.] have a history of engaging in violent physical altercations in the child’s presence. On prior occasions, the mother’s male companion struck the mother in the child’s presence. On prior occasions, the mother’s male companion broke

2 We provide herein an abbreviated statement of the case because we are not reviewing the merits of the challenged orders for substantial evidence. Rather, we are reviewing Mother’s challenge to the orders from the six-month review hearing for mootness. 3 K.R.’s father, who was incarcerated during these dependency proceedings, is not a party to this appeal, and the juvenile court did not sustain any allegations against him.

3 items in the home. On a prior occasion, the mother’s male companion struck the mother and choked the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.