C.T.

Background The record in this appeal is largely unworkable. Mother has filed appendices under various appellate case numbers and seeks judicial notice of records filed in yet other appellate cases. She has also filed numerous requests for judicial notice of volumes of documents. In the interest of judicial efficiency, we deny all requests for judicial notice on the grounds of relevance, with the exception that we take judicial notice of the appellant’s appendix and respondent’s appendix filed in appellate case No. A161993. A full recitation of the lengthy custody and domestic violence proceedings between the parties is not necessary for resolution of the present appeal. The following summary is sufficient: “The parties’ son was born in November 2018. . . . [I]n February 2019, father initiated the present action under the Domestic Violence Prevention Act, [Family Code] section 6200 et seq., in San Francisco, requesting protective orders as well as sole legal and physical custody of his son. In support of his request for a protective order, father submitted documents evidencing mother's repeated online cyberstalking and harassment of father, conduct which . . . led to the…