Berookhim Royal Catering v. Farnad CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 6, 2022B311529California9,543 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/6/22 Berookhim Royal Catering v. Farnad CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

BEROOKHIM ROYAL CATERING, B311529

INC. et al., (Los Angeles County Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants Super. Ct. No. 20STCV15941) and Respondents,

v.

SHAHBAZ FARNAD et al.,

Defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Stuart M. Rice, Judge. Affirmed. Blank Rome and Arash Beral for Defendants, Cross- complainants and Appellants; Devaney Pate Morris & Cameron, Susan L. Mason and David R. Plancarte for Defendant, Cross- complainant and Appellant Shahbaz Farnad. Law Offices of Payam Poursalimi, Payam Y. Poursalimi; Azadegan Law Group and Ramin Azadegan for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.