Johar

Johar v. Cal. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 11, 2022A162563MCalifornia10,547 words

Opinion

Opinion

Streeter, J.

Filed 10/11/22 (unmodified opn. attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

REENA JOHAR,

Plaintiff and Appellant, A162563 v. (Alameda County Super. Ct. CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT No. HG20073074)

INSURANCE APPEALS BOARD ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

et al., AND DENYING REHEARING; Defendants and Respondents. CHANGE IN JUDGMENT

THE COURT:

The petition for rehearing filed by appellant Reena Johar is denied, subject to the following modification of the opinion filed in this appeal on September 13, 2022: 1. On page 20, in the first full paragraph, in the fourth sentence which begins, “Under this procedure, . . .” insert “a” before the phrase “claim with the EDD” so that the sentence reads: Under this procedure, within 10 days of mailed notice that a former employee has filed a claim with the EDD for unemployment, section 1327 requires the employer to submit “any facts then known that may affect the claimant’s eligibility for benefits, including, but not limited to,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.