People v. Turpin CA6
Opinion
Opinion
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant Elliot Brent Turpin was convicted by jury of driving under the influence (DUI) of a drug (Veh. Code, § 23152, subd. (f)), misdemeanor possession of a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a)), misdemeanor possession of controlled substance paraphernalia (Health & Saf. Code, § 11364, subd. (a)), and misdemeanor driving with a license suspended due to a prior DUI (Veh. Code, § 14601.2, subd. (a)). The trial court found true prior conviction allegations regarding count 1 (Veh. Code, § 23550.5; Pen. Code, § 1170.12, subd. (c)(2)). Defendant was sentenced to six years in prison. On appeal, defendant contends: (1) the evidence at trial did not establish the corpus delicti of the offense of DUI apart from defendant’s out-of-court statements; (2) there is not substantial evidence that he was driving while under the influence of a drug; (3) there is not substantial evidence that a drug sufficiently affected his ability to drive; and (4) the prosecutor committed misconduct in argument to the jury. For reasons that we will explain, we will affirm the judgment.