Romero

Romero v. Gonzales CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 12, 2022F083055California1,649 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/12/22 Romero v. Gonzales CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

FRANCISCO GARCIA ROMERO,

F083055

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. VCU285265) v.

VALDRIE GONZALES, OPINION Defendant and Appellant.

THE COURT*

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County. Bret D. Hillman, Judge. Valdrie Gonzales, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant. Law Offices of Randolf Krbechek and Randolf Krbechek for Plaintff and Respondent. -ooOoo-

* Before Franson, Acting P. J., Peña, J. and Meehan, J. Defendant Valdrie Gonzales (defendant or Gonzales) appeals from a default judgment. As described below, Gonzales has failed to carry the appellant’s burden of affirmatively demonstrating the trial court erred…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.