Romero
Romero v. Castro CA5
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 10/12/22 Romero v. Castro CA5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
FRANCISCO GARCIA ROMERO,
F083108
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. VCU285265) v.
AARON CASTRO, OPINION Defendant and Appellant.
THE COURT*
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County. Bret D. Hillman, Judge. Aaron Castro, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant. Law Offices of Randolf Krbechek and Randolf Krbechek for Plaintff and Respondent. -ooOoo-
* Before Franson, Acting P. J., Peña, J. and Meehan, J. Defendant Aaron Castro (defendant or Castro) appeals from a default judgment awarding plaintiffs $11,339.25 and enjoining him from interfering with plaintiffs’ easement. Castro’s appellate brief does not include any…