Romero

Romero v. Castro CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 12, 2022F083108California1,634 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/12/22 Romero v. Castro CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

FRANCISCO GARCIA ROMERO,

F083108

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. VCU285265) v.

AARON CASTRO, OPINION Defendant and Appellant.

THE COURT*

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County. Bret D. Hillman, Judge. Aaron Castro, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant. Law Offices of Randolf Krbechek and Randolf Krbechek for Plaintff and Respondent. -ooOoo-

* Before Franson, Acting P. J., Peña, J. and Meehan, J. Defendant Aaron Castro (defendant or Castro) appeals from a default judgment awarding plaintiffs $11,339.25 and enjoining him from interfering with plaintiffs’ easement. Castro’s appellate brief does not include any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.