Thee Aguila v. ERDM CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 12, 2022B299717California6,178 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/12/22 Thee Aguila v. ERDM CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

THEE AGUILA, INC, et al., B299717 c/w B299725, B299757 and B299780 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. v. Consolidated No. VC059422)

ERDM INC., et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, John A. Torribio, Judge. Affirmed. Jessica Robin Barsotti for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Century Law Group and Karen A. Larson for Defendants and Respondents Century Law Group, Karen A. Larson and Santiago Acuna.

_______________________________ This consolidated appeal arises out of multiple lawsuits spanning over a decade between appellants Thee…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.