Aziz

Aziz v. City of Maywood CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 14, 2022B314247California1,738 words

Opinion

Opinion

Harutunian, J.

Filed 10/14/22 Aziz v. City of Maywood CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

NADIYA AZIZ, B314247

Petitioner and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No.19STCP04963) v.

CITY OF MAYWOOD,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Mitchell L. Beckloff, Judge. Affirmed. Roger J. Diamond for Petitioner and Appellant. Richards, Watson & Gershon, T. Peter Pierce, Ginetta L. Giovinco and Sarah E. Gerst for Defendant and Respondent.

_________________________________ Nadiya Aziz appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying her petition for writ of administrative mandamus. She argues that the City of Maywood’s denial of her application for a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.