Briggs

Briggs v. Brown

Good Law
2017 Cal. LEXIS 959·212 Cal. Rptr. 3d 871·387 P.3d 1254
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 2017S238309California440 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Order to show cause issued

The court on its own motion substitutes Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Attorney General, as respondent in place of **1255 Kamala Harris, in her official capacity as former Attorney General. The "Application for Leave to File Reply to Petitioner's Opposition to Motion to Intervene Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 387(a)," filed on January 18, 2017, is granted. The Clerk is directed to file the reply, the supplemental declaration of Charles H. Bell, and the appendix of exhibits, all received on January 17, 2017. The "Motion to Intervene in Opposition to Petitioner's Petition Seeking Relief to Prevent Enforcement of Proposition 66," filed by Californians to Mend, Not End, the Death Penalty-No on Prop. 62, Yes on Prop. 66 on January 9, 2017, is granted. The Clerk is directed to file the declarations in support of the motion and the "Complaint in Intervention in Opposition to the Petitioners' Petition for Writ of Mandate," all received on January 9, 2017, and the "Preliminary Opposition of Intervenor Californians to Mend, Not End, the Death Penalty-No on Prop. 62, Yes on Prop. 66 to the Petition for Extraordinary Relief," and "Intervenor's…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.