Lone Jack Ranch v. Perkins CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 1, 2013D060995California3,856 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/1/13 Lone Jack Ranch v. Perkins CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

LONE JACK RANCH, LP, D060995

Plaintiff, Cross-Defendant and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. GIN053365) v.

VIRGINIA PERKINS,

Defendant, Cross-Complainant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County,

Timothy M. Casserly, Judge. Reversed with directions.

This is a dispute between adjacent property owners, Lone Jack Ranch LP (the LP)

and Virginia Perkins. The issue on appeal is whether the trial court misinterpreted a 1981

settlement agreement between the parties' predecessors in interest, which pertains to

Perkins's access to her property over a private road on the LP's property. We find error

and reverse the judgment with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.