Smith v. United States Internal Revenue Service

Good Law
235 F. App'x 420·374 B.R. 420
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 16, 2007No. 06-17301California272 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Darrel Smith, on behalf of himself and his bankruptcy estate, appeals the decision of the district court affirming in part the bankruptcy court’s order resolving the tax liability of Smith’s estate for the tax year *421 1996. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158 (d).

“A party may not appeal from a judgment or decree in his favor, for the purpose of obtaining a review of findings he deems erroneous which are not necessary to support the decree.” United States v. Good Samaritan Church, 29 F.3d 487, 488 (9th Cir.1994) (quoting Elec. Fittings Corp. v. Thomas & Betts Co., 307 U.S. 241, 242 , 59 S.Ct. 860 , 83 L.Ed. 1263 (1939)). Despite denying Smith’s requests for favorable tax treatment on certain matters, the bankruptcy court awarded Smith a full refund of the taxes paid by his estate for the tax year 1996, plus statutory interest. Although not every issue was resolved in Smith’s favor, those he contests were not necessary to the judgment and will not bind him in subsequent litigation. See id. at 489. Since the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider this appeal, the district court order is vacated to the extent that it affirms the rulings of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.