Rund

Rund v. Kirkland (In re EPD Inv. Co.)

Good Law
587 B.R. 711
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 25, 2018Case No.: 18–1413 DSF; Bankruptcy No.: 12–02424 ERCalifornia3,773 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Fischer, J.

On February 17, 2018, the United States Bankruptcy Court filed a Report and Recommendation (R & R) and proposed findings recommending that this Court grant Chapter 7 Trustee-Plaintiff Jason Rund's motion for summary adjudication on his claim that Defendants made fraudulent transfers with actual intent. Defendants John Kirkland and Poshow Ann Kirkland (as trustee of the Bright Conscience Trust) object to the R & R, and submit additional evidence.

Pursuant to Rule 9033(d) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, the Court has reviewed the additional evidence and the portions of the Bankruptcy Court's findings of fact to which written objections have been filed. For the reasons stated below, the Court rejects the recommendation and findings of the Bankruptcy Court and denies the motion for summary adjudication.

I. Facts and Procedural Background

This is one of several bankruptcy proceedings involving EPD Investment Co., LLC (EPD). See Dkt. 4. In December 2010, creditors commenced the involuntary petition at issue here. Appendix Record (REC), Dkts. 15-17, at 11982.

Pressman is the sole proprietor of EPD. Id. Plaintiff alleges EPD has not been profitable since before 2003. Id.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.