Rund

Rund v. Kirkland (In re EPD Inv. Co.)

Good Law
594 B.R. 423
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 2018CV 18-08317 DSF, CV 18-08323 DSF; Bankruptcy No.: 12-02424 ERCalifornia915 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Fischer, J.

Defendant John C. Kirkland, and Poshow Ann Kirkland, as Trustee of Defendant Bright Conscience Trust (BC Trust), move the Court to withdraw the reference of adversary proceeding No. 12-02424 ER to the bankruptcy court. Dkt. 1. 1 The *425 Court deems this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78 ; Local Rule 7-15. The motion is GRANTED.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

This is one of several bankruptcy proceedings involving EPD Investment Co., LLC (EPD).

Jerrold S. Pressman is the sole proprietor of EPD. Id. Jason M. Rund, the Chapter 7 Trustee (Rund), alleges EPD has not been profitable since before 2003. Id. Between 2003 and 2009, EPD allegedly lost money every year. See id. Rund also alleges that EPD has operated as a Ponzi scheme since 2003, specifically alleging that EPD used investments it received to pay existing creditors. Id. By 2009, EPD had allegedly stopped making payments to its creditors because it lacked cash infusions from new investors. Id.

John Kirkland served as Pressman's lawyer for his various ventures and allegedly invested money in EPD. Id. Rund's basic allegation is that Kirkland took various steps to hide EPD's…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.