Finkelstein

Finkelstein v. AXA Equitable Life Ins. Co.

Good Law
325 F. Supp. 3d 1061
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 5, 2018Case No. 4:17-cv-01089-JSWCalifornia2,925 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

JEFFREY S. WHITE, United States District Judge *1064 Now before the Court is the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company ("Equitable"). Having carefully reviewed the parties papers, considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS Equitable's motion to dismiss.

BACKGROUND

On January 30, 2017, David Finkelstein ("Plaintiff") filed a complaint alleging claims for breach of contract and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing against Equitable, his insurance company. Equitable moves to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).

Plaintiff, an obstetrician-gynecologist, purchased four Equitable disability income policies between the years of 1982 and 1989. In or around 1995, Plaintiff began to experience severe right wrist pain, hand pain, and weakness, which affected his ability to perform his job. ( See Compl. ¶ 16.) In or around 1998, Plaintiff was diagnosed with carpometacarpal joint subluxation and osteoarthritis. Shortly thereafter, Plaintiff submitted a claim for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.