Fundingsland

Fundingsland v. OMH Healthedge Holdings, Inc.

Good Law
329 F. Supp. 3d 1123
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 18, 2018Case No. 15-cv-01053-BAS-WVGCalifornia8,281 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Hon. Cynthia Bashant, United States District Judge *1127 Defendant OMH Healthedge Holdings, Inc. ("OMH") awarded Plaintiff John Fundingsland stock options as part of his employment compensation. Several years later, another company purchased a controlling interest in OMH. This transaction automatically terminated all of OMH's outstanding stock options awards. And, because Plaintiff had never exercised his options, they were extinguished and became worthless.

As a result, Plaintiff brings this diversity action seeking relief against OMH. He argues OMH breached the parties' contracts by not informing him of the impending transaction. The company now moves for summary judgment on Plaintiff's remaining claims for breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing under Delaware law. (Mot. Summ. J., ECF No. 47.) Plaintiff opposes. (Opp'n, ECF No. 67.) The Court heard oral argument on the motion. (ECF No. 69.)

Plaintiff fails to demonstrate a triable issue of fact on his breach of contract claim. Nor does he show compelling issues of fairness justify this Court invoking the implied covenant under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.