Marriage of Moore Jelks and Jelks CA2/3

INTRODUCTION

Tanisha Moore-Jelks appeals from the order granting Gregory Jelks’s motion to compel discovery responses and requiring Moore to pay $1,200 in attorney fees to Jelks’s attorney.1 Moore contends the trial court erred because she did in fact provide the information sought by Jelks’s discovery requests. Because Moore has not provided an adequate record to review her contention, and the limited record before us does not support her position on appeal, we affirm the order.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The parties were married in 2004 and separated in 2012. They have two minor children. In November 2015, the court signed the parties’ stipulated judgment for dissolution of marriage. The judgment stated, among other things, that the child support awards were based on the present financial incomes of the parties and the court reserved jurisdiction over the issue of child support. Apparently, in response to a pending child support dispute, Jelks propounded and served Moore with discovery requests. According to the case summary in the clerk’s transcript, on December 3, 2020, Jelks filed a motion to compel discovery responses and for attorney fees. The motion was supported…