Flint

Flint v. Trope CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 18, 2022B313081California4,970 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/18/22 Flint v. Trope CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

MICHAEL FLINT, B313081

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. 19STCV09519)

KONRAD TROPE et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, David Sotelo, Judge. Affirmed. The Milner Firm and Timothy V. Milner for Plaintiff and Appellant. Klinedinst, Dan Lawton and Mark M. Imada for Defendants and Respondents Konrad Trope and Trope Law Group, P.C. _____________________ Michael Flint, represented by Konrad Trope, sued Pamela Koslyn, Flint’s former tenant and attorney. The matter was ordered to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.