Leger

Leger v. R.A.C. Rolling Hills

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 18, 2022D080705California3,448 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/17/

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

MARY LEGER, as represented, etc., D080705

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 37-2022- 00007625-CU-PO-CTL) v.

R.A.C. ROLLING HILLS L.P. et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Joel Wohlfeil, Judge. Affirmed. Wilson Getty, William C. Wilson and Dawn A. Phleger; Williams Iagmin and Jon R. Williams for Defendants and Appellants. Niddrie Addams Fuller Singh and John S. Addams; Pick Law and Lukas I. Pick; Elder Law & Advocacy and Andrew A. Thompson for Plaintiff and Respondent. R.A.C. Rolling Hills LP, dba ActivCare at Rolling Hills Ranch, and ActivCare Living, Inc. (together, ActivCare), appeal from an order denying their petition to compel arbitration in the elder abuse lawsuit filed by Mary Leger. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1281.2.)1 ActivCare contends the trial court erred

Undesignated statutory references are to the Code of Civil Procedure. in concluding that it had waived its right to arbitration because it moved with alacrity by seeking to compel arbitration less than 30…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.